The discussion moves to the USNI Blog Where Capt Salamander zero’s in on the “tacticization of strategy” aspect. The Comments are the interesting part.
Another great essay at The Diplomat by james Holmes and Toshi Yoshihara responds to Norman Friedman’s critical review of their book Red Star Over the Pacific but the important part of the article is a discussion of Micheal Handel’s warning about “tacticization of strategy:
Battlefield commanders and many civilians are prone to become spellbound by technological and tactical wizardry. In so doing, they lose sight of the higher – and ultimately decisive – levels of competition and warfare. Since World War II, observes Handel, “technological means have started to wag the strategic dog.” Andrew Krepinevich strikes a similar note in The Army and Vietnam, faulting the U.S. Army for prosecuting a “strategy of tactics.” U.S. forces seldom lost a tactical engagement with Vietnamese regular or irregular forces, yet they were unable to derive strategic or political gains from these engagements. Conflating equipment and tactics with strategy rendered an unbroken string of battlefield triumphs largely moot.
We run the risk of doing the same sort of thing with AirSea Battle if we are not careful. The new Joint Operational Access Concept, with its verbose description of sound military planning with the new improved ingrediant “cross-domain synergy” offers little to the conversation. Hopeful more (any?) meat will be added to the bones as things progress…
This Blog post at the Diplomat by Naval War College Professor of Strategy James Holmes discusses it in terms of a shift from Mahan to Corbett in our thinking.
There is a link to the document in the piece.